Drawing for BIRKA

USPTO serial 85637127

BIRKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Molan

ROBERT A. MOLAN NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Shopping bags, namely, canvas shopping bags, leather shopping bags, reusable shopping bags, wheeled shopping bags and textile shopping bags; Leather and imitations of leather; leather and imitation leather goods, namely, briefcases, wallets, luggage bags; Bands of leather; bags for campers, namely, backpacks, hiking bags; Bags for climbers, namely, hiking bags, roll bags; bags for sports; Belt pouches, namely, leather pouches, wearable strap-on pouches; Back frames for carrying children; Rucksacks; School bags; Leather shoulder belts; Harness straps; Leather straps; Suitcase handles; Suitcases; Travelling bags; Trunks; Travelling trunks, Leather travelling sets, namely, luggage, carry-on bags; Toiletry cases sold empty; Umbrella covers; Umbrella handles; Umbrellas; walking sticks; handbags; purses; walletsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 8, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 9, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2015EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2014CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 9, 2014EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance