USPTO serial 85637348
8UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 8UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H. Swyers, Esq.
MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY PLLC344 MAPLE AVE WESTSTE 151VIENNA, VA 22180Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Coats, t-shirts, head wear, long sleeve t-shirts, short sleeve shirts, tank tops, sports bras, sweatshirts, sweatpants, thongs, hoods, pants, jeans, shorts, bathing suits, hats, caps, balaclavas, socks, sweatbands, wrist bands, head bands, jackets, cloth bibs, chaps, cowboy hats, belts, underwear, boxers, pajamas, lingerie, rain jackets, rain pants, polo shirts, sweaters, vests, jerseys, gloves, scarves, shoes, flip flops, sandals, outerwear, namely, ponchos, face coverings, namely, knit face masks, wetsuits, booties, sun glasses, backpacks, dress shirts, jock straps, athletic uniforms, footwear, cleats, golf shoes, skirts, blouses | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |