Drawing for LOGIX PAYMENT VARIANCE ANALYTIX

USPTO serial 85640888

LOGIX PAYMENT VARIANCE ANALYTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGIX PAYMENT VARIANCE ANALYTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evan A. Raynes

EVAN A. RAYNES SYMBUS LAW GROUP, LLC1425 K ST NW STE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3514UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing payments and identifying underpayments to medical providersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 15, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 13, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 5, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance