USPTO serial 85641761
PAVING PALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAVING PALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Westminster BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | (Based on Intent to Use) Asphalt, pitch and bitumen; Bitumen; Bitumen asphalt; Bitumen-based asphalt sealants; Bitumen-based driveway sealants; Bitumen-based roofing sealants; Bitumen-based sealants for asphalt; Bitumen-based sealants for driveways(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Asphalt, pitch and bitumen; Bitumen; Bitumen asphalt; Bitumen-based asphalt sealants; Bitumen-based driveway sealants; Bitumen-based roofing sealants; Bitumen-based sealants for asphalt; Bitumen-based sealants for driveways | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |