USPTO serial 85643552
BLOODY BEAUTIFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLOODY BEAUTIFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boucherville, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |