USPTO serial 85648670
ALMOND PREFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5135187Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2017
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALMOND PREFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Montréal, Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Montréal, Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Montréal, Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-dairy non-alcoholic almond based beverage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ALMOND PREFERENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |