Drawing for RED CARPET

USPTO serial 85649310

RED CARPET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED CARPET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Tidman

MARK TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business support services, namely, marketing and business consulting for others in the field of telecommunications and computerized communicationsACTIVE—
036Venture capital advisory services and venture capital services, namely, providing funding to othersACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, design and development in the field of telecommunications, mobile networks, mobile device technology and computerized communication; research, design and development services, namely, the provision of equipment and facilities for the testing and development of concepts, products and services; provision of facilities and testing environments in which parties can collaborate and conduct trial innovations in relation to mobile telecommunications networks; design and development of telecommunications products and services; technical support and consultation services for developing telecommunications products and servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 8, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance