USPTO serial 85650617
ISIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4549946Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2014
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dianne Smith-Misemer
Dianne Smith-Misemer HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business risk management; business risk management consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 036 | Financial risk management; financial risk management consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 041 | Training in the use of a simulated enterprise network computer environment, said simulation consisting of simulated hardware, software, servers, workstations, portable computers, routers, switches, and security elements, namely, router firewalls, proxy servers and network address translation devices, for the foregoing equipment for computer security interdiction training; Educational testing services, namely, the testing of others in the field of computer security interdiction, using a simulated enterprise network computer environment, said simulation consisting of simulated hardware, software, servers, workstations, portable computers, routers, switches, and security elements, namely router firewalls, proxy servers and network address translation devices, for the foregoing equipment; Organizing educational competitions in the field of computer security interdiction, using a simulated enterprise network computer environment, said simulation consisting of simulated hardware, software, servers, workstations, portable computers, routers, switches, and security elements, namely router firewalls, proxy servers and network address translation devices, for the foregoing equipment; Providing training in the use of computers for all aspects of computer network attack, defense, response and investigation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2010 |
| 042 | Computer consultation in the field of computer security; research in the field of intelligence and security technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; consulting services in the field of national security | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iSight Security Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by iSight Security Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by iSight Security Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ISIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 17, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |