USPTO serial 85650654
MOAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Auburn Hills, MI
AUBURN HILLS, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
WILLIAM M BRYNER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1001 WEST FOURTH STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, their structural parts, trim and badges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CTDA | CT DECISION: AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |