USPTO serial 85653932
SCANAFLU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCANAFLU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moffett Field, CA
Moffett Field, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BILL ALFORD
BILL ALFORD ALFORD LAW GROUP, INC.23052H ALICIA PKWY # 201MISSION VIEJO,, CA 92692-1636UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile hand-held computers, namely, software for medical diagnosis, analysis, coordination of patient records, remote coordination of symptoms with patient records, analysis of body fluids, body functions using a device attached to a mobile hand-held computer; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Integrated medical examination systems comprising medical devices and computer software for information management for use in web-based physical examination and assessment of patients in a remote, clinical setting; Medical diagnostic apparatus, analytical apparatus for medical purposes and blood pressure measuring apparatus; Medical diagnostic instruments for the analysis of body fluids; Medical imaging apparatus incorporating medical imaging software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users to enter, access, track, monitor and generate health and medical information and reports | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing an internet website for medical professionals and medical patients featuring medical information from remote locations via devices that feed information to the website that is processed, exchanged and accessed in real-time by users; Providing an internet website for medical professionals and medical patients featuring medical information from remote locations via electronic patient monitoring devices that feed in formation to the web site that can be accessed in real-time by medical professionals for purposes of monitoring and diagnosing medical conditions; Providing on-line medical record analysis services designed to provide patients with custom tailored information about the range of possible diagnoses and therapies associated with a defined set of symptoms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCANADU INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by SCANADU INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named SCANAFLU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |