USPTO serial 85654137
FULLTONE RANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FULLTONE RANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman
TODD BRAVERMAN PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical apparatus for use with musical instruments, namely, guitar, bass, keyboard and musical instrument amplifiers; audio processing equipment, namely, audio signal processing equipment for processing musical instrument audio signals in the nature of limiters, compressors, gates and expanders; electrical circuits for musical instrument amplifiers, namely, tube and solid state amplification circuits, volume and tone control circuits, overdrive and sustained overdrive circuits, non-overdrive circuits, reverberation and tube reverberation circuits; cabinets for loudspeakers and musical instrument amplifiers; extension speaker cabinets; speaker cabinets; loudspeakers; components and accessories for guitar, bass, keyboard and musical instrument amplifiers, namely, amplifier foot pedal controls, and amplifier switches; replacement parts for guitar, bass, keyboard and musical instrument amplifiers, namely, cables, connectors, knobs and amplifier handles | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | Electronic effects pedals, stomp boxes, distortion pedals and overdrive pedals for use with guitars, bass guitars, keyboards and musical instruments and parts therefor and instructional manuals, sold as a unit; audio processing equipment in the nature of musical instrument effects units, namely, reverberation units, echo chambers and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fulltone Musical Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fulltone Musical Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named FULLTONE RANGER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |