Drawing for FUTUREFIT

USPTO serial 85654677

FUTUREFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTUREFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Satorius

DANIEL M. SATORIUS SATORIUS LAW FIRM, PC80 S 8TH ST STE 2000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations, running errands and providing customer specific information in the fields of health, nutrition, lifestyle wellness, energy efficiency, and renewable resources to improve health and lessen adverse effects on the environment to meet individual needs, all rendered in business establishments, office buildings, hotels, residential complexes and homesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance