Drawing for THREADLINE

USPTO serial 85654723

THREADLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THREADLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony McNamer

Anthony McNamer MCNAMER & COMPANY PC321 SW 4th Ave., Ste. 305PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platforms for organizing text and mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance