USPTO serial 85655243
ACCOUNTABLE CARE FOUNDATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCOUNTABLE CARE FOUNDATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management, analyzing and monitoring data, electronic storage and transmission of data, electronic management and processing of health data for use in improving quality and efficiency in the provision of healthcare and reducing the costs of healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business and management consulting for healthcare providers and related businesses; Consulting in the field of business performance improvement and change management; all of the foregoing excluding healthcare benefits counseling and healthcare benefits consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use in database management, monitoring and managing volume of health data, analyzing and monitoring data, electronic storage and transmission of data, electronic management and processing of health data for use by others for use in the healthcare field; Computer software design, installation and maintenance; Custom design and development of computer software; Cloud computing featuring software for use in database management, monitoring and managing volume of health data, analyzing and monitoring data, electronic storage and transmission of data, electronic management and processing of health data for use in the field of healthcare; Cloud computing featuring software for use in database management, monitoring and managing volume of health data, analyzing and monitoring data, electronic storage and transmission of data, electronic management and processing of health data for use in improving quality and efficiency in the provision of healthcare and reducing the costs of healthcare; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use in database management, monitoring and managing volume of health data, analyzing and monitoring data, electronic storage and transmission of data, electronic management and processing of health data for use by others for use in improving quality and efficiency in the provision of healthcare and reducing the costs of healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WhiteCloud Analytics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WhiteCloud Analytics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACCOUNTABLE CARE FOUNDATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2019 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |