Drawing for PHOTOBUCKET STORIES

USPTO serial 85655433

PHOTOBUCKET STORIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTOBUCKET STORIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan E. Ferguson

NATHAN E. FERGUSON WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Hosting of digital content on the internet; Providing on-line non-downloadable software to enable or facilitate the uploading, downloading, streaming, posting, displaying, blogging, linking, and sharing of data over communication networks; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for social networking, creating a virtual community, and transmission of photographic images, text, graphics, video and dataACTIVE—
045internet-based social networking services allowing users to communicate and share, store, transmit, view, and download electronic media, pictures, images, text, videos and photos; online social networking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 2, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance