Drawing for ULTRA-POS

USPTO serial 85656056

ULTRA-POS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-POS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer keyboards; computer terminals; computer operating recorded programs; blank optical data carriers; blank magnetic data carriers; smart card readers; chip card readers; blank smart cards; personal stereos; microphones; cash registers; bar code readers; telephones; camcorders; computer monitors; transmitters of electronic signals; electrical inductorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance