USPTO serial 85656591
TISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan M. Harris
ALAN M. HARRIS LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. HARRIS3278 WILSHIRE BLVD.#901LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Adhesives for cosmetic use; After-sun lotions; After-sun oils; All-purpose cleaners; Anti-aging cleanser; Antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use; Aromatic oils; Artificial fingernails; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath herbs; Bath lotion; Bath milks; Bath oils; Beauty creams; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Blush; Body art pens; Body butter; Body crayons; Body creams; Body masks; Body oils; Body powder; Body splash; Body sprays; Bubble bath; Cleaner for cosmetic brushes; Cleaning and washing preparations; Cold cream; Cologne; Compacts containing make-up; Concealers; Conditioners; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics for animals; Cotton balls for cosmetic purposes; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Cuticle conditioners; Decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; Detergents for household use; Eaux de toilette; Emery boards; Essential oils; Eye compresses for cosmetic purposes; Eye cream; Eye gels; Eye liner; Eye make-up remover; Eye shadow; Eyebrow cosmetics; Face and body creams; Face and body glitter; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Face paint; Face painting kits; Face powder; Facial cleansers; Fake blood; False eyelashes; Fingernail decals; Foot powder; Foot scrubs; Foundation; Fragrances; Hair bleach; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair creams; Hair dye; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair spray; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Henna for cosmetic purposes; Incense; Lip balm; Lip gloss; Lipstick; Lipstick cases; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up remover; Mascara; Massage lotions; Massage oil; Moisturizing creams; Nail care preparations; Nail gel; Nail glitter; Nail hardeners; Nail polish; Nail polish remover; Nail stencils; Nail tips; Perfume oils; Pet shampoo and conditioner; Potpourri; Rouges; Sachets; Scented room sprays; Shaving cream; Shower and bath gel; Skin bronzer; Skin cleansers; Soaps; Sun block; Sun screen; Suntan oils for cosmetic purposes; Suntanning preparations; Tattoo removal preparations; Temporary tattoo sprays and stencils therefor sold as a unit; Theatrical make-up; Tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Toners; Wipes impregnated with a skin cleanser | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |