USPTO serial 85656913
THE SMART WAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SMART WAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth Townsend Bridge
ELISABETH TOWNSEND BRIDGE WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK S.C.555 E WELLS ST STE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3819UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal scaffolding and shoring, namely, sectional tubular scaffolding, tubular scaffolding systems comprised of vertical posts, truss bearers, horizontal bearers and runners, wheel casters, brackets, tie-off components, namely, tie shield anchors, tie eye bolts and tie tubes, clamps, tie tube nuts and wall brackets, diagonals, planks, toeboards, plank fillers, stair units, stair fillers, access ladders and gates, support components, namely, beams, throat headers, adjustable support brackets, fixed boiler brackets and saddle braces, support frames, hoist arms; tube and clamp tubular scaffolding and construction elements in the nature of shoring; structural parts of metal scaffolding, namely, metal rolling towers; suspended access system for making supports in the nature of ramps and platforms and consisting primarily of structural support devices, namely, steel girders, supports, beams, joists, connecting and support nodes, pins, deck supports, beam clamps, chains, decking, guardrails and toe boards, and parts thereof, for personnel access, event, construction, refurbishing, maintenance and repair purposes; seating system comprised of metal bleachers, grandstands and chair risers | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Mechanized personnel lift system for use with building construction, maintenance and repair comprised of power swings, lift chairs and outrigger hoists | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer software used in the scaffolding industry for design and estimation; computer software used in the scaffolding industry for tracking inventory, labor and costs; computer software used in the scaffolding industry for training in the areas of scaffolding erection, use and dismantling, and related safety issues; video recordings, CDs and DVDs relating to scaffolding erection, use and dismantling, and related safety issues; providing downloadable electronic publications in the nature of product brochures, instruction manuals, safety guidelines, technical data guides and brochures and pamphlets relating to customer testimonials, all in the field of scaffolding and shoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |