USPTO serial 85658083
PRO SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4526352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2014
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan E. Grant
JONATHAN E. GRANT GRANT PATENT SERVICES2107 HOUNDS RUN PLSILVER SPRING, MD 20906-6327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery; non-electric hand-operated kitchen gadgets, namely, choppers, slicers, fruit and vegetable peelers, and fruit and vegetable shredders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2012 |
| 021 | Kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, sieves, graters, potato mashers, cookware, namely, steamers, pots and pans, roasting pans, cooling racks, baking pans, cookie jars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WESTMINSTER 1973, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Westminster, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westminster, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westminster, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PRO SMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2014 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |