USPTO serial 85663100
ECOLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5041303Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2016
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EDISON, NJ
EDISON, NJ
Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
Edison, NJ
Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
Edison, NJ
Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
Edison, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita C. Chipperson, Esq.
RITA C. CHIPPERSON, ESQ. CHIPPERSON LAW GROUP, P.C.2 GREEN VILLAGE RD STE 301MADISON, NJ 07940-2582UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements for human consumption; Food supplements; Nutritional Supplements; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; Powdered dietary and nutritional supplements drink mixes; Pre-mixed nutritionally fortified beverages; Protein fortified and nutritionally fortified snack bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHON VITAMIN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RELIANCE VITAMIN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Vitamin Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ECOLEAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |