USPTO serial 85664924
CYCLAMEN WAVEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4362542Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2013
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYCLAMEN WAVEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Ditico
HANS GERRITSENPO 7446SPRECKELS, CA 93962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural products, namely, cyclamen young living plants, dried plants, and seeds | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2014 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 31, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |