USPTO serial 85666071
NUMNUMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUMNUMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry F. Soalt
Barry F. Soalt Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of interactive computer database information featuring information about food, wine, beverages, cooking, baking, entertaining, recipes, diet, nutritional advice, dining and restaurant information, kitchen design, equipment and accessories, etiquette and travel, forums and polls.; Computer services, namely, creating computer network-based indexes of information, websites and resources; Computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to consolidate and manage social networks, accounts, and connections to existing and emerging application programming interfaces (APIs); Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Computer software development in the field of on-line databases in the field of cooking, food, wine, beverages, baking, entertaining, recipes, diet, kitchenware, cooking equipment and accessories.; Custom design and development of software, online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists.; Design and development of computer software for mobile and online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists.; Design, development, and implementation of software for mobile and online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists.; Hosting an online website featuring resources related to nutrition, finances and recipes; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for mobile and online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists.; Providing a members-only website featuring technology which provides members with the ability to manage domestic inventory, groceries, nutrition, recipes; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows mobile and online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists.; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to share, bookmark, index, store, collect and showcase content, articles, images, calendars, products, projects, and other information resources in electronic form in the nature and field of health and nutrition; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software allowing web site users to upload, post and display online videos for sharing with others for entertainment purposes; Providing a website featuring a search engine for recipes; Providing a website featuring resources, namely, a website featuring primarily non-downloadable software for recipe sharing and management, nutrition and meal planning and also featuring non-downloadable publications in the nature of recipes in the field of cooking; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to manage and share their cooking.; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to share recipes, nutrition information, savings tips; Software development and product development consulting in the field of mobile and online programs and database management systems for nutrition, recipes and shopping lists | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |