Drawing for A SEAT AT THE TABLE

USPTO serial 85668101

A SEAT AT THE TABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A SEAT AT THE TABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff and Michael A. Grow

KATRIN LEWERTOFF AND MICHAEL A. GROW ARENT FOX LLP1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019-5820UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Mirrors, picture frames; sculptures of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plasticACTIVE—
021Beverage glassware; busts, figures, sculptures and statues made of porcelain; busts, figures, sculpture and statues made of earthenware; earthenware mugsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, jackets, caps, hats, pants, belts, bandanas, scarves, sweaters, sweatshirts, polo shirts, shorts, tank tops, swimwearACTIVE—
033SpiritsACTIVE—
035Promotional sponsorship of music eventsACTIVE—
036Financial sponsorship of music eventsACTIVE—
041Entertainment, namely, arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting music events; entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; arranging of contests, sweepstake services, sweepstake services provided over a global computer networkACTIVE—
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance