USPTO serial 85668171
LISAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LISAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Anderson
STEPHEN L. ANDERSON Anderson & Associates31285 Temecula Parkway, Suite 240Temecula, CA 92592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Compotes; edible oils and fats; eggs; jellies, jams; meat extracts; meat, fish, poultry and game; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |