USPTO serial 85668227
GINGER-EZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GINGER-EZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisel M. Ferguson
Lisel M. Ferguson Rimon, PC1655 W. Fairview Ave.Ste. 102Boise, ID 83702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary herbal supplement containing ginger; tablet containing ginger to help with symptoms of motion sickness, nausea, and stomach queasiness; capsule containing ginger to help with symptoms of motion sickness, nausea, and stomach queasiness; dietary supplement containing ginger formulated for sublingual delivery to help with symptoms of motion sickness, nausea, and stomach queasiness | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |