Drawing for KLEM

USPTO serial 85669526

KLEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Patrick SAGE

G. PATRICK SAGE HUESCHEN AND SAGE PLLC107 W MICHIGAN AVE STE 700KALAMAZOO, MI 49007-3976UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, polyvalent immunoglobulins for treating dermatomyositis and polyvalent immunoglobulins for treating polymyositisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 28, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance