USPTO serial 85669591
EASYSET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RATCLIFFE, ROBERT L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASYSET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Greenwald
JOHN W GREENWALD GARDNER GROFF GREENWALD & VILLANUEVA PC2018 POWERS FERRY ROAD SUITE 800ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction and repair in the poured-in-place concrete industry; Installation of aluminum faced modular panel wall and slab form system for the use in poured-in-place concrete structures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 6, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |