USPTO serial 85670073
Z KETTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Z KETTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal
ANTHONY H. HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY LLC501 KINGS HWY EFAIRFIELD, CT 06825-4867UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Collaboration tools and services, namely, telecommunication access services allowing parties to do one or more of the following: view, listen to, adapt, store, receive, organize, and share materials; collaboration tools and services, namely, telecommunication access services which allow parties to do one or more of the following: view, listen to, adapt, store, receive, organize, and share materials delivered over the Internet and over another publicly accessible network; collaboration tools and services, namely, telecommunication access services allowing parties to do one or more of the following: view, listen to, adapt, and share materials, for enabling persons such as writers, musical artists and illustrators to collaborate with each other over a publicly accessible network; collaboration tools and services, namely, telecommunication access services allowing parties to do one or more of the following: view, listen to, adapt, store, receive, organize, and share materials, and share materials for enabling persons such as writers, musical artists and illustrators to collaborate with each other to create works incorporating multiple media elements such as narrative textual content, music and illustrations in works of fiction and non-fiction; providing services in the nature of telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images, and data by telecommunication networks, allowing for the creation of works and incorporating multiple media elements such as narrative textual content, music and illustrations in works of fiction and non-fiction for electronic devices such as smartphones, computers, e-readers, touchscreen computers, and tablets; collaboration services, namely, telecommunication access services which allow parties to view, adapt, and share materials such as such as narrative textual content, music and illustrations in works of fiction and non-fiction to enable persons such as writers, musical artists and illustrators to collaborate with each other within or across disciplines to compare work over a publicly accessible network to compose e-books; collaboration services, namely, providing email services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |