USPTO serial 85670720
THE SLIDELESS PAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SLIDELESS PAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bret E. Field
BRET E FIELD BOZICEVIC FIELD & FRANCIS LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVESTE 200EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2297Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents for scientific or medical research use; Diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use; Chemical solutions and preparations consisting of pre-mixed reactants and reagents for scientific and research use in connection with amplification, analysis or labeling of nucleic acid | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Diagnostic reagents for medicinal use; Medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing of body fluids; Reagents and media for medical and veterinary diagnostic purposes and Reagents for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |