USPTO serial 85673015
N-SULGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2013
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with N-SULGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger A. Gilcrest
ROGER A. GILCREST ICE MILLER LLP250 WEST STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215-7513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Semi-processed plastic composite material in the form of sheets for use in molding manufacturing, namely, sheet molding compounds having electrical resistance and shielding properties, sheet molding compounds having ultraviolet absorptive properties, sheet molding compounds having flame resistance or flame retardant properties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named N-SULGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |