USPTO serial 85674156
SECURELOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURELOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Agostino
JOSEPH AGOSTINO GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVE STE 104FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical connectors; electrical plugs; electrical outlets; electrical plug device enabling connection and disconnection of power and/or control cables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |