Drawing for USN

USPTO serial 85674849

USN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie Ann Gregory

JULIE ANN GREGORY MIDDLETON REUTLINGER401 S 4TH ST STE 2600LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-4408UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038broadcasting sports and entertainment programming and information via the internet, digital, electronic, or wireless networks; sports and entertainment channel broadcast via the internet, social media, and other communications networks and devices; webcasting services; podcasting services; mobile media services in the nature of transmission, broadcasting and delivery of audio, video and multimedia entertainment content including text, data, images, audio, video and audiovisual files by means of the internet, wireless communication networks and devices, electronic communications networks and devices, computer networks, wireless and mobile devicesACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the fields of sports and entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 5, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 7, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 7, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance