USPTO serial 85675340
ADAM'S KANDY FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADAM'S KANDY FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pound Ridge, NY
Pound Ridge, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Grenier, Esquire
MICHELLE L. GRENIER, ESQUIRE GRENIER LAW OFFICES PC13 FOX RUN RDFALMOUTH, ME 04105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplement energy bars for use as a meal substitute and dietary supplement; nutritional meal replacement energy bars for medical purposes; soy protein based meal replacement nutrition bars for medical purposes; ready-to-eat meal replacement nutritional bars for medical purposes; ready-to-eat meal replacement energy bars for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Soy protein based nutrient dense snack bars also containing seeds, fruits, vegetables and nuts; seed-based nutrient dense snack bars; seed-based nutrient dense snack bars also containing soy, fruit, vegetables and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |