Drawing for CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 85676012

CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maxim H. Waldbaum, Esq.

Maxim H. Waldbaum, Esq. Eaton & Van Winkle LLP3 Park Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, books, and training publications in the fields of business management, organizational development, organizational change, leadership development, individual development, effective communications and relationships at an individual and organizational level and corporate or organizational alignment and communication frameworks at an individual and organizational levelACTIVE—
035Business consulting services, namely, consulting in the fields of business management, organizational development, organizational change, leadership development, individual development, effective communications and relationships at individual and organizational levels, and corporate or organizational alignment and communication frameworks at an individual and organizational levelsACTIVE—
041Educational and training services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the fields of business management, organizational development, organizational change, leadership development, individual development, effective communications and relationships at an individual and organizational level, corporate or organizational alignment and communication frameworks at an individual and organizational level, personal relationships, sales strategies and marketingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2014PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 12, 2014PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 26, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 19, 2014TPDDTEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance