USPTO serial 85676630
TAVOLA FRESCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5816286Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2019
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TAVOLA FRESCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
KIRSTEN SEVERSON KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126 4TH AVENUE POSTVANCOUVER, BC;, V6K4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cooking oil; edible oil; salad oil; vegetable oil; potato-based gnocchi; tomato paste; antipasto; processed pimentos; processed olives; dried figs; processed tomatoes; sundried tomatoes; pickled vegetables; processed vegetables; processed artichokes; processed peppers; processed mushrooms; processed beans; soups; cheeses; fish for food purposes; processed anchovies; packaged deli meats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flour-based gnocchi; baking products, namely, Italian specialty yeasts and food flavorings, non-essential oils used as a food flavoring; confectioneries, namely, candies and chocolates; vinegar; egg noodles; pasta; lasagna; pasta sauces; tomato sauces; spices; pimentos used as a condiment, capers; rice; cornmeal; biscuits; bread sticks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit nectars, fruit juices, and mineral water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferisco Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferisco Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferisco Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TAVOLA FRESCA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |