Drawing for BADDASS

USPTO serial 85676763

BADDASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BADDASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Hill

Richard L. Hill DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR PC3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400Lehi, UT 84043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Athletic equipment, namely, basketballs, sport balls, basketball goals and nets, backboards for basketball, volleyballs, footballs, football goals, football body protectors, soccer balls, soccer goals, golf balls, golf clubs, golf bags, non-motorized golf carts, boxing gloves, hockey gloves, hockey pucks, hockey goals, hockey sticks, lacrosse sticks, lacrosse gloves, lacrosse balls, tennis balls, tennis rackets, skateboards, toy flying saucers for toss games, surfboards, snow boards, snow skis, water skis, scuba flippers; exercise machines; exercise equipment, namely, exercise weights and weight lifting machines; manually operated exercise equipment in the nature of step machines, elliptical machines, treadmill machines; excluding martial arts training equipment, and excluding baseball equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance