Drawing for BADDASS NUTRITION

USPTO serial 85676846

BADDASS NUTRITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BADDASS NUTRITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Hill

RICHARD L HILL DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR PC4844 NORTH 300 WESTSUITE 300PROVO, UT 84604-5670

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Hats, caps, shirts, t-shirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, tank tops, underwear, socks, jackets, athletic uniforms, jerseys, headbands, swim wear, swim suits, ski pants, ski jackets, snowboarding pants, snowboarding jackets, wet suits, swim wear for use while scuba divingACTIVEMar 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 14, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 16, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2014GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2014GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2014CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 5, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 5, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 5, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance