USPTO serial 85677827
FLO-TITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLO-TITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Wilson
JEFFREY L WILSON JENKINS WILSON TAYLOR & HUNT PA3100 TOWER BLVDUNIVERSITY TOWER STE 1200DURHAM, NC 27707-2563Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial ball valves being parts of machines for fluid flow processing; industrial ball valves of one quarter inch or greater in diameter being parts of machines; v-port pump control valves; threaded and flanged valves being parts of machines; cryogenic valves being parts of machines; pneumatic actuators for valves for fluid flow control; limit pressure switches as parts of machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Precision engineered high-pressure industrial ball valves of one quarter inch or greater in diameter made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; pneumatic and electric actuated automated precision engineered high-pressure industrial ball valves made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; multi-port and pipeline automatic precision engineered high-pressure industrial ball valves made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; three (3) piece automatic precision engineered high-pressure industrial ball valves made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; carbon steel, stainless steel and bronze automatic precision engineered high-pressure industrial ball valves; metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material precision engineered high-pressure industrial v-port control valves for regulating the flow of liquids; metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material automatic precision engineered high-pressure industrial threaded valves; metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material flanged automatic precision engineered high-pressure industrial valves; precision engineered high-pressure industrial automatic tank valves made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; precision engineered high-pressure industrial automatic cryogenic valves made of metal, stainless steel, carbon steel, non-fiberglass and non-iron material; actuation and control equipment, namely, electric actuator for precision engineered high-pressure industrial valves for industrial fluid control; electro-mechanical controls for precision engineered high-pressure industrial valves for industrial fluid flow control; electric actuators for actuating precision engineered high-pressure industrial valves for industrial fluid flow control; electro pneumatic positioners and limit flow switches for industrial monitoring and controlling the flow of liquids using precision engineered high-pressure industrial valves | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Valve design services for fluid flow valves and controls; design and selection services for ball valves for fluid flow; actuation and control design and selection services for valves and controls for fluid flow; valve automation design and selection services for valves for fluid flow control; custom design services for ball valves and valve automation controls; and providing engineering process control services for fluid flow valves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flo-Tite, Inc. Valves and Controls
- Other trademarks owned by Flo-Tite, Inc. Valves and Controls
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLO-TITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |