Drawing for PIECE CORPS

USPTO serial 85678751

PIECE CORPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIECE CORPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Himich

MATTHEW J HIMICH THOMPSON COBURN LLP505 N 7TH STSTE 3500ST LOUIS, MO 63101-1693

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Eye liner; Lip gloss; Lipstick; Mascara; PerfumesACTIVE—
009Downloadable electronic game programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 11, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 11, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 20, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 20, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance