USPTO serial 85680181
CLINICAL PERFORMANCE INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLINICAL PERFORMANCE INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina N. Rubke, Esq.
CRISTINA N. RUBKE, ESQ. SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP1 MARITIME PLZ FL 18SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Analyzing and compiling data for measuring the operations of inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings for use by clinicians, healthcare industry decision makers, and managers; enterprise business information reporting services for hospitals and outpatient facilities, namely, hospitals, physician practices, clinics, departments, and individual physician specific reports for the purpose of analyzing and understanding patient care, healthcare provider performance, financial performance, and operational efficiency; data compiling and analyzing in the field of healthcare; financial metrics of healthcare costs; information management services for the healthcare industry; business management consultation and advisory services in the areas of patient satisfaction, physician practice, productivity, revenue, profitability | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web-based system for healthcare professionals that analyzes quality of care and costs; computer, information technology, and application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software applications for use by others for data collection, aggregation, business planning, monitoring, analysis, best practices, interactive analytics, comparisons, management and evaluation of patient care, healthcare provider performance, financial costs, quality outcomes, mortality rates, length of stays, avoidable admissions, and readmissions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |