Drawing for KARACA

USPTO serial 85680453

KARACA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARACA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H. SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W STE 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Boats; Recreational watercraft, namely, sailing yacht, motor yacht, powerboats, YachtsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 27, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 11, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Nov 13, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Nov 13, 2012RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
Nov 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance