Drawing for FRAMELOGIC

USPTO serial 85682937

FRAMELOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FRAMELOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Visser

MICHELLE L VISSER RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVESTE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Film production and post-production software, namely, computer software for the dailies processingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 20, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 20, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 20, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 27, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 12, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance