USPTO serial 85683789
SLYDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLYDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lincoln, Lincolnshire,, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Paulius
THOMAS D PAULIUS TD PAULIUS IP ATTORNEY8224 RED OAK LANEORLAND PARK, IL 60462UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Ironmongery in the nature of screws and fixings, namely, screws of metal; metal brackets for furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers; metal furniture and kitchen drawer runners; metal catches for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors; metal handles for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors and drawers, metal guides and metal locks for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers and furniture and kitchen cabinet windows; metal fixings and fittings, namely, hinges, screws, brackets and mounting plates for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers and furniture and kitchen cabinet windows and pull out and rotating shelves; non powered metal furniture and kitchen cabinet door and drawer closers; metallic suspension devices, namely, organizers and inserts for holding items stored in furniture and kitchen cabinets, furniture cabinet drawers and furniture and kitchen cabinet cupboards; bins of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Items of non metallic hardware, namely, fixings and fittings for furniture and kitchen cabinets, namely, furniture and kitchen cabinet hinges; furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers; furniture and kitchen drawer units primarily comprised of drawers; non metal parts of furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers and furniture and kitchen cabinet doors, namely, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawer and furniture and kitchen cabinet door fronts; parts of furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers, namely, side panels for furniture cabinet drawers; non metal furniture cabinet drawer runners; non metal catches for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors and furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers; non metal handles, guides and locks for furniture and kitchen cabinet doors, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers and furniture and kitchen cabinet windows; non metallic suspension devices, namely, wire inserts, non metal wire bins and non metal bins for furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers, furniture and kitchen cabinets and furniture and kitchen cupboards; Items of metal hardware, namely, furniture and kitchen cabinet and furniture and kitchen cabinet drawer dividers and organizers; wire inserts for furniture and kitchen cupboards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring furniture, namely, kitchen cabinets and drawers therefor, furniture and kitchen cabinet shelves, furniture and kitchen cabinet hinges, furniture and kitchen cabinet locks, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawers, furniture and kitchen cabinet doors, furniture and kitchen cabinet door closers, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawer closers, furniture and kitchen cabinet drawer runners, bins, metallic fixings for furniture and kitchen cabinets, and pull out and rotating shelving units mounted in such kitchen cabinets and drawers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |