USPTO serial 85684990
GRETTACOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRETTACOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M BAKER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO PC666 THIRD AVENUE24TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017-4011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, cleansers, facial and body scrubs, tonics, beauty masks, cosmetic masks, facial masks, body and skin masks, skin peels, moisturizers and hydrators, creams, beauty gels, sun tanning and sun care preparations, skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, lighteners, skin brighteners, lotions, makeup removers, body splash and body oil, skin concealers, cosmetic preparations for skin renewal, skin exfoliants, skin mousse, non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin serum, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin conditioners, skin emollients, skin soap, topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes, wrinkle removing skin care preparations; cosmetics, fragrances for personal use and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Toiletry and cosmetic bags sold empty, handbags, tote bags, satchels, clutch bags, sling bags, bucket-shaped carry-all bags, purses, change purses, all-purpose athletic bags, carry-on bags, diaper bags, duffel bags, garment bags for travel, gym bags, leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, school bags, shoulder bags, suit bags, textile shopping bags, wrist-mounted carry-all bags, briefcases, knap sacks, back packs, waist packs and accessories, namely, wallets and key cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cosmetic applicators and accessories, namely, brushes, facial sponges for applying makeup, powder puffs, facial pads for applying makeup, eyebrow and eyelash brushes; hair brushes and combs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, blouses, shirts, t-shirts, jerseys, sweaters, jackets, suits, undergarments, socks, pants, slacks, jeans, shoes, hats, bathing suits, body suits, gym suits, jogging suits, sweat suits, warm-up suits, coats, gloves, belts, hosiery, dresses, skirts, scarves; fur clothing, namely, coats, jackets, stoles and hats, slips, panties, teddies, caps, wrap-arounds, shawls, pajamas and robes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gretta Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gretta Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GRETTACOLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |