USPTO serial 85685198
E-VOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-VOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Karlsruhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
JOHN J. O'MALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 S. 17TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drive motors and engines for aircraft; motors and engines, except for land vehicles, in particular electric motors; aircraft motors, in particular electric; housings for machines, engines and motors; electric generators; control units for machines, engines and motors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; data processing equipment and computers; accumulator batteries, alarm apparatus, electric connecting pieces, connecting pieces for electric leads, automatic control devices for aircraft, observation instruments, computers, computer peripheral equipment, computer software, data carriers, data processing equipment, data processing devices, receiving apparatus, navigation equipment for aircraft, control apparatus, charging apparatus for electric accumulator batteries, measuring apparatus, measuring instruments, physical apparatus and instruments, lifesaving equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, in particular electrically driven multicopters; apparatus, machines and devices for aviation, in particular propellers, rotors, tires; safety belts for aircraft seats; parachutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |