USPTO serial 85685374
BET LIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BET LIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Qualahnia Suggs-Randall
1 BET PLAZA 1235 W ST NEBUSINESS & LEGAL AFFAIRSWASHINGTON, DC 20018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of live and prerecorded concerts, live and recorded comedy shows, and television and musical program tapings; Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of educational seminars in the fields of music, fashion, television production, script writing, personal finance, and technological advancements; Entertainment in the nature of fashion shows; Organizing community festivals featuring educational seminars in the fields of music, fashion, television production, script writing, personal finance, and technological advancements; Entertainment in the nature of educational seminars in the fields of music, fashion, television production, script writing, personal finance, and technological advancements; Entertainment in the nature of festivals featuring music, fashion, art, food, television and movie screenings, television and musical program tapings, live and prerecorded concerts and live and recorded comedy shows; Entertainment services in the nature of ongoing comedy shows; Presentation of live comedy shows; Entertainment, namely, production of concerts, comedy shows, educational seminars, and television shows; Film and video production; Music production services; Organizing community festivals featuring primarily concerts, comedy shows, fashion shows, and educational seminars in the field of music, fashion, television production, script writing, personal finance, and technological advancement and providing television and musical program tapings, interactive exhibits, cultural exhibits, educational and musical demonstrations and giveaways; and Planning arrangement of showing movies, television and theatrical shows, plays and musical performances; Presentation of live show performances | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |