USPTO serial 85686778
BET THE FLOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BET THE FLOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
JASON M. VOGEL KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer hardware; smartphones; portable two-way radios; mobile telephones; personal digital assistants; wireless computer peripherals; wireless telecommunication devices for data and image transmission; handheld computers; computer gaming and gambling software; apparatus for wireless transmission and reception of data including gaming and gambling data; computer game software; computer gaming software; computer game software for gaming machines; computer software for games of chance on any computerized platform, including wireless telecommunication devices and handheld computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gambling machines; gaming machines, namely, mobile and wireless gaming and gambling machines; electronic slot machines; computerized table games for gaming purposes: video poker machines; video sports book machines, namely, machines that allow users to bet on sporting events; video lottery machines; wireless telecommunications devices, namely, portable gaming devices that accept wagers; wireless gaming and gambling machines with video output; wireless gaming consoles, namely, computer game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; computer gaming and gambling hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; wagering services; casinos; entertainment services, namely, casino gaming, gambling, and betting services; entertainment services, namely, the provision of online casino gaming, gambling, and betting services; entertainment services, namely, casino gaming provided via wireless telecommunications devices; providing information in the fields of gaming and gambling; providing information in the field of sporting events; arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events via online and mobile telecommunications devices; providing casino games and video games via telecommunication or computer networks; sporting and cultural activities, namely, provision of information relating to organizing sporting and cultural activities, contests and games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of electronic gaming and gambling systems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for gaming and gambling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cantor Fitzgerald Securities
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BET THE FLOP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |