USPTO serial 85687132
ARISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
NARESH KILARU FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER, LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Very large scale integration (VLSI) semiconductor integrated circuits, silicon chips, sensor chips for scientific use, semiconductors, semiconductor chips, and semiconductor devices; integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, and integrated circuit modules for digital video compression and decompression; integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, and integrated circuit modules for encoding and decoding digital video; encoded electronic chip cards for computers and mobile telephones; encoded electronic chip cards, namely, smart cards; design libraries, namely, downloadable electronic data files for use in integrated circuit and semiconductor design; computer chips; chip carriers, namely, semiconductor chip housings; nano tubes, namely, tubular carbon molecules used in extremely small scale electronic and mechanical applications; carbon nano tubes, namely, tubular carbon molecules used in extremely small scale electronic and mechanical applications; software for medical imaging equipment, namely, for interpreting the results of CT scanners; medical software for processing and displaying breast images on medical resonance imaging machines (MRI's); medical software for processing and displaying images on ultrasound medical imaging machines; medical imaging software that records, monitors and analyzes data using a catheter-based ultrasound imaging probe; computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information; electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software; downloadable computer software in the field of memory training activities sold as a unit with positionable figures; automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; computer communications software to allow customers to access bank account information and transact bank business; computer software used for the control of voice controlled information and communication devices; computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; computer database management software for use in personalizing the content of e-mail communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing research in the area of semiconductor processing technology; providing on-line, non-downloadable, internet-based software application for medical billing for physicians and health care institutions; computer services, namely, operating computer systems and computer networks featuring broadband transmission and energy transmission software for public utilities and others; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software; computer software development; computer software design; computer software development and computer programming development for others; design and development of on-line computer software systems; design and development of computer software; design of computer networks and software for others; design, development and implementation of software; developing customized software for others; computer software development in the field of freight transportation by truck, rail, air and ocean; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of personal productivity, wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software; providing information relating to on-line non-downloadable software to facilitate electronic communication between individuals provided via the Internet; providing information in the fields of technology and software development via an on-line website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |