USPTO serial 85688361
AUTOTWANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOTWANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Eastley
SHERRI L. EASTLEY PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2120AUSTIN, TX 78701-2973UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; Communications software for connecting mobile users; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for creating, sharing and consuming music; Computer graphics software; Computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer software for processing digital music files; Computer software featuring musical sound recordings or musical video recordings; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for manipulating digital audio information for use in audio media applications; Computer software for use in relation to digital animation and special effects of images; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software platforms for development of interactive audio applications for use with mobile audio platforms; Computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable computer software executable to cause mobile devices to function as musical instruments; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices that enables users to transform and enhance the video and audio capabilities of their mobile devices; Downloadable computer software executable to communicate amongst mobile devices using audio encodings of information; Downloadable computer software executable to provide mobile devices with signal processing capabilities; Downloadable computer software that creates a voice changer feature on a mobile device; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices that enables users to interactively perform individualized audio and video; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices that enables users to send music, text, audio, video, and graphics information to other users of mobile devices; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices for enabling users to download and share interactive audio and music using mobile phones; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices for enhancing audio and video capabilities for entertainment purposes; Downloadable computer software for mobile devices for personalizing audio performances on a mobile device based on interaction of user; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 24, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |