USPTO serial 85690146
PREMIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREMIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Moffatt
MICHAEL J MOFFATT FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DRFL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LED, IND, eHID, HID, CF lighting fixtures for use in commercial, industrial, residential, and architectural accent lighting applications; lighting fixtures for outdoor lighting applications; lighting fixtures for use in parking decks, parking lots, walkways, street lights and garages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |